Secret Scandals of the Past Century -Justice Destroyed By Corruption

How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction.
Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world,
easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history,
perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs.

Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants.
That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.

The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."

For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to:
pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in
New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of....
Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today
in the American arena of jurisprudence.

This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon.
Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.

If you don't get involved, in this or any other civic outrage, who will get involved for you?

The world is not the same place it was not so many years ago.
Back then, most politicians were in public office to serve, because they cared.
For anyone to make the same claim today is both specious and groundless.
The only people who might make such a claim have spurious claims.
Either they do not better, or they are making money themselves.
Learn to get more involved; that's why we have communities.
Again, you're asked just one basic, simple question:
If you don't get involved, if you don't make a try,
who will make that effort for you and yours?
Please do not tell us what you can do.
Better to show us what you can do.
Better yet, show the first face
you see in any mirror.